Friday, March 25, 2011

No options off the table

I heard on the news last night that although the United States’ major role in the Libyan conflict is over, they are “not taking any military options off the table”. I think that’s a mistake, because you know what that means? That means they have a table that is completely covered with military options. Now they’re going to have to eat on the floor and stuff. And to read a map, they’ll have to try to hold it open in the air with both of their hands and try to look at it while it’s all flopping around and trying to fold back up on them. I’ve done that before, and it’s really frustrating. Then they’re going to get all mad, and to get their aggression out, there’s going to be this whole table with military options all over it just sitting there, ready for them to use. Well, you know they’re only going to be able to resist that for so long, and pretty soon they’ll be launching missiles again into Libya, and maybe even other countries too. Just wait, you’ll see. But if they were to take just, say, like, maybe one or two military options off the table (they could just put them on the floor, or if that takes up too much room, maybe they could just stick them underneath the table. I mean, the table is big enough that it could hold them on top of it along with all the other military options, so surely there’s enough room to store them under it, right?), then they’d have room enough to put a nice vase with like flowers or something in it. Then that might cheer them up enough that when the map made them mad or whatever, they could just look over at the pretty flowers and maybe even go smell them, and then they’d feel all better. I just hope they don’t knock a bomb or anything off of the table and onto their foot, because that might hurt and make them mad, and then there would be all of this military stuff just sitting there, waiting to be used…