Sunday, June 3, 2012

Period Fashions for Natural Wonders?

For time immemorial, people have worn and appreciated the fashions of their times, only to be ridiculed by successive generations for their “awful” and “tacky” clothes, tastes, etc. This was true until recently, when fashion designers learned they could make far more money and make far less effort by simply tricking young people into wearing new versions of old, recycled styles, like bell-bottoms, “skinny” jeans, etc. But up until recently, slick swingers from any age would deck themselves out in the most fashionable attire and accessories imaginable to look totally cool and cutting-edge, just to be ridiculed by people in the future for how dated and ridiculous their clothing looks.

So, given that there are fashions in clothing, accessories, haircuts, etc., even in architecture and interior decorating and furnishings, that always seem to go out-of-style and become passé, I was wondering if there were natural landscapes that are tourist destinations that are fashionable for a time, and then become gauche in successive periods. Like for example, you know how the 1960s had many bright colors and natural, hippie fashions, only to be succeeded and replaced by the synthetic and artificial fabrics and styles of the 1970s? Well, what if people in the 1960s loved the open, natural, brightly-colored expanses of the Grand Canyon, and later generations found it to be garish and overblown and indulgent? Does this sort of thing ever occur?

I imagine people visiting the great redwood forests of Redwood National and State Parks in California, and saying: “This is just a bunch of big trees: who cares? Only stupid tree-huggers would be impressed by this, just because these trees are too big to hug!” And then I imagine others saying stuff like: “Look at all these bright, tacky colors! And it’s just a big hole in the ground anyway. Really, what’s so special about this so-called ‘Grand Canyon’? It’s just tacky! I can’t believe people used to like this thing; I’m so over it!” Or I imagine maybe someone else going to see “Old Faithful”, and saying: “Wow, it just sprays some water up every once-in-a-while? How boring! I guess back before video games and the Internet this was pretty cool, but it’s just dull and lame now. Where’s the variation? It’s just a one-trick-pony if you ask me. I can’t believe people used to think this was cool! And really: ‘Old Faithful’? Talk about jejune! Maybe that was cool back when people stayed married and stuff due to the social stigma of divorce, but nowadays it just makes it sound like it’s stodgy and prudish because no-one’s attracted to it, and it can’t get laid and ‘swing’ due to its lack of options: loser.” But then they all think Niagara Falls is wonderful.

And then, in another few years, everybody’s taste shifts again, and suddenly Niagara Falls has “jumped the shark”, and the natural wonder and beauty of the Grand Canyon is hot and hip again, while people are just moderately impressed by the “so-so” natural wonder of Yosemite National Park. And so and so, with tastes varying down future generations just like with clothing fashions. I wonder, does this actually happen?