Wednesday, August 15, 2012

New Cigarette Packaging Kerfuffle

Well, apparently Australia, to get revenge on America for winning too many swimming medals at the Olympics, has passed some new law to keep innocent tobacco companies from seducing young children with their hypnotically beautiful package designs. I think they’re going to force cigarette companies to sell them in non-brand-looking packages or something. And in those wonderful “give them an inch and they’ll take a mile” and “woe is us, you cheaters” traditions, today also saw lots and lots of demanding of extra steps and hand-wringing from the two sides on the news, with the anti-smokers crowd demanding graphic gore on the cigarette packages again, and with cigarette people saying it’s no fair they don’t get to seduce people with slick marketing and stuff. Or something.

Look, I know anti-smoking types want to guilt trip everyone with the gory pictures, but this is not the right idea to stop people from smoking, I’m telling you. Okay, first of all, those gory pictures just look like the gross makeup from zombie movies, and as zombies are very popular, everyone will want to be like the zombies, so they’ll smoke, hoping they’ll get all gory looking. Next, isn’t it obvious that people don’t care about each other or themselves by now? We’ve got people shooting and stabbing each other all over the place, and people eating themselves into obesity like crazy: do you really think warnings are going to work? No, there’s only one way to make people take notice that might make some people quit, and it’s this:

Look, we all know most people, especially Americans, care a lot more about cute animals than they do about people. Even movies that show people being murdered, violated and mangled in every imaginable manner cannot show a dog getting killed: people simply won’t stand for it. So what they should do is say that cigarettes hurt kittens and puppies, with smokers drowning them in second-hand smoke, etc. And then they can mandate a picture on cigarette packs of a lit cigarette being put out on some puppy’s nose, or on a little kitten’s head (don’t worry: it would all be faked!). Then maybe people would care. Plus, it would be harder to buy and possess those packs of cigarettes, because everyone would see the abused animals and gasp and sneer at people carrying them around.

But this is only a partial fix, for many people who smoke hate everything, so they might find it to be a bonus that their product is harming baby cute animals, and they’ll buy up every last pack and smoke a carton a day. But then we’d be rid of them sooner, so maybe it would be a win/win for the anti-smoking crowd. Because, admit it, anti-smokers: you really just want to kill them (smokers) all anyway, so why not just mandate they put more poisons in cigarettes, just to whittle down their numbers? After all, the sooner anti-smoking activists just admit that they’re murderous haters too, the sooner we’ll trust them and the more we’ll all take them seriously.